The Gemini in my Eye: My Mostly Not Crazy Split Personality

Send to Kindle

GEMINI_persephonespath_SmallI was born a Gemini.

I find that detail very fitting, which in turn I find ironic, considering I don’t believe one ounce in the zodiac and the supposed personality traits associated with being born under a certain sign. I don’t even really know what the traits of a Gemini are, but what I do know is that Gemini is the constellation depicting twins. I have always felt a little like there are at least two people inside me.

Not in a Sibyl sort of way, but in a perfectly sane, lovely, quirky, and infuriating way.

I think one of the reasons I’ve never really felt like a conservative, or a liberal politically is that I’ve always had both a logical side and a creative side. Not that one side of the political camp has exclusive rights on one way of thinking, but generalities undeniably exist that separate one side from the other. I don’t believe that logic and creativity are necessarily at odds with each other. The greatest scientists and engineers the world has known have had both of these qualities. I am not a great scientific thinker, but I have always found it easy to understand both a cold, reason-based argument, and an emotional, passion-based one, even when they conflict with each other. Note I said understand, not necessarily agree with.

My first name is Mary and I’ve often heard the rhyme “Mary, Mary, quite contrary” directed at me. As you would expect, hearing it makes me chafe and then prove them right when I yell out “No I’m not!” Despite my protestations, I can see the truth in it, and I think I finally understand why. I find it very easy to understand multiple perspectives and points of view. Left, right, conservative, liberal, crazy, boring… To an extent, I think I can easily see from another’s eyes. I don’t necessarily support or internalize all perspectives, and sometimes I’ll defend positions I don’t support, which probably confuses people, and then makes them think I do support a position I don’t support, thus making people think I’m something that I’m not. Or just appear wishy-washy. Or alternatively, close-minded (another time for that discussion, which I find “amusing”).

Sigh… I’m confusing myself a little, so I feel your pain. This blog is best read very quickly.

Ultimately, I think my internal Gemini is the source of madness for me and people who know me, but I also know I wouldn’t have it any other way (that’s the strong-minded, extroverted twin speaking now instead of the wall-flower twin). This seemingly useless ability is what might make me a good fiction writer some day. The twins have allowed us (yeah, I caught that “us” too) to seek knowledge from a wide swath of topics we find fascinating, and given us the desire to debate those topics with others (sometimes they debate these topics with themselves!), and to truly understand other perspectives I alone might not hold. That is essential to developing good characters, and conflict. A good writer allows the characters to tell their stories, rather than inject herself falsely into their minds.

There’s a frustrating down side. Sometimes having this “split personality,” with a healthy love of discussion and debate has made me feel isolated. I’ve never really felt like I think in the same way as most other people I know. Unconventional is the nice way to put it. I’ve always been able to think about things from a different angle. I’m not unique in that way among humans. I doubt I’m even unique among people I do know. But I have never connected with anyone who sees the world quite like I do.

Except for maybe my “twin.”

 

 

  • dave denio

    that ‘seeing things from both perspectives’ can be both blessing and curse. I have never participated in a fist fight, mostly because I think too much and react too little. I remember in wrestling, this thinking thing was a curse, I actually would feel empathy for someone I would beat. Of course this made me a pretty poor wrestler. I have gotten past that attitude in my adult life, very competetive now. Being able to see from both sides is a good thing, unless it leads to the inability to have convictions. I think of Pastor Mike over at Zion, you have no idea where he stands on anything (except that he despises Michelle Bachman). His sermons will seem to be heading towards a statement of conviction, then turn very opaque lest anyone’s feelings be hurt. I sat on the task force about the ELCA social statement and observed at how he has mastered the art of making everyone think he supports their view, which is not possible in a task force to determine validity of statements. I get frustrated, as I am sure you do, with facebook discussions in which people hold carte blanche views. I consider myself an independent, but if you make a statement about one narrow position, it is assumed you embrace every nuance of a particular party. I embrace my ability to both reason and feel and stay sane by having thought through my life philosophy and staying true to it.

    • http://www.persephonespath.com/ PersephoneK

      My life philosophy is ever evolving. As I learn new information and ways of seeing the world, I’ll amend my point of view (if warranted). That is not to be confused with lack of conviction. I agree with your frustration with people assuming you believe everything because you believe a part of a position, as I alluded to in my post, but of course, we all only see what the other person shows us and can never see inside a person’s mind to know all of what they think about anything. Words often fail us. And written words can fail us by being set in stone.